Knowing the TRUTH sets you free
Knowing the truth sets you free
this posting is aimed at adolescents, their parents, friends, influencers & teachers
I have over the years listened to homophobic hate preachers pointing to the high rates of suicides among adolescent and teenage gays , calling it an indicator of homosexuality’s harmful nature. It is more to do with society listening to these hateful preachers and believing them . They Lie
THEY LIE
_______________________________________
As it occurs in nature among other mammals there is no way it can be unnatural.
As it occurs proportionately the same in all cultures, civilizations and races, it is normal .
The purpose of this posting is to tell you dear reader,
that homosexuality is not a sin, either .
So what's all this talk about Leviticus I hear you ask ?
Besides the homophobes quoting Leviticus, man lying with man, is there anything else you know about Leviticus ?
Am assuming the answer is No.
Odd that don't you think ! Out of 27 chapters in the book of Leviticus, homophobes only talk about 2 verses .
It is the book of Leviticus that tells us if a woman gives birth to a male child she is unclean for 7 days, however if she gives birth to a female child she is unclean twice as much, for 14 days. Strange the homophobes never mention that bit of Jurassic crap.
The actual chapter verse (12:2) reads verse If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child.
“Conceived seed” an odd expression for God to have used, being well versed in human biology.
The writer of the book of Leviticus and the authors all the other books of the bible we off the opinion that the woman, property of the man, was merely the incubator of the male seed. They had no idea what so ever that the woman contained an egg. And that the egg was fertilized by the sperm from the man. I can understand the writer of Leviticus not knowing that, but the words are supposed to be God’s words, God didn't know his own creation?? give me a break.
Mankind only discovered the female egg in the 17th Century by an English physician, but God didn't know about it in the time of Leviticus,?? Give me a break
another thing the homophobes will not tell us, as it doesn't suit their homophobic agenda is that in the Greek language from which the King James Version was translated the word for woman and wife are interchangeable.
Lets insert “wife” for “woman”
Leviticus 18:22
Thou shalt not lie with man, as with wife: it is abomination.
Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with his wife, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
No way any of those verses are talking about gay men who don't have wives.
But as I say it must be borne in mind the writer did not know that the woman had an egg, merely believed that the woman incubated the male seed. A clear indication who ever was talking to the writer it was not The creator of the universe. Perhaps like Paul the epistle writer he was a schizophrenic seeing visions and hearing voices that were not real
finally the male homophobes who quote Leviticus, all have beards if they believe in Leviticus , think about it, facial hair grows daily, by design its a gift from God , they reject it and shave it off, something prohibited by Leviticus.
Hypocrisy = as we say ¬ not as we do
_______________________
As I have pointed out already Jesus does not condemn homosexuality in any shape or form but there is one thing the homophobes will mention concerning marriage. They will try and apply to gays . Even on that they lie
they will quote From Matthew 19, verses 5&6 stating that a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife and they shall become one flesh, they will then lie and say that's God's plan for everyone
It is not in the homophobic agenda to point out that Jesus went on to say in verse 11, what He said concerning marriage is not IS NOT for everyone , only those who can accept it. some men were born gay or made gay (eunuch ), anyway what he said concerning marriage was not for everyone.
see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+19&version=KJV
___________________
What about Paul the apostle and his writing you might ask
I firmly believe that if Paul-the-sinner (his own admission)
Paul-the-Pharisee ( his own admission)
were alive today he would either be in a mental institution or living with the medication given to those diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic.
If you have seen the motion picture about the life of Nobel prize winner Mathematician Professor John Nash, you will know that Professor John Nash’s visions and voices were very real to him. Not real to anyone else, but real to him.
That is the case I believe with Paul. His schizophrenic visions were real to him. No one else witnessed these. The apparition of his schizophrenic Jesus, calling him to be an apostle, were not real to anyone else.
Paul never sat and listened to the teaching of Christ, Never seen Jesus in the flesh, heard Jesus, never touched Jesus but surprise surprise what ever he says , is #godspeak to the homophobe, the fundamentalist, the evangelical. its Blasphemy
His only authentic writings 1st Thessalonians Galatians 1st Corinthians 2nd Corinthians Romans Philemon Philippians (in the order they were written) are sourced from his Pharisee background and learning , not one word heard from the lips of Jesus the Christ
Paul’s ever changing road to Damascus alleged conversion story would have been very different had he lived 30 years longer than he did. You see Paul-the-schizophrenic never got to read a Gospel. No Gospel was written until after he died. Had Paul read the Gospel of Matthew, he would never have imagined a god complaining to him about persecution. In the sermon on the mount, Matthew tells how Jesus tod his disciples that they would be persecuted,b that persecution makes us better humans and greater our reward in heaven. Paul would never have come up with a persecution story.
Had Paul-the-schizophrenic read Matthews Gospel and got an insight into how were will all be judged for heaven or hell , based solely on out humanity Matthew 25:31-46
he would never have written the following rectum-derived passages.
One from Romans
one from 1st Corinthians .
No one can convince me that the judging God envisaged by Paul-the-schizophrenic is the same Judging God envisaged by Matthew ,
Paul's God is concerned with man’s narcissistic self-righteousness
,
whereas Matthews God is concerned with man’s humanity
the 2 cannot be the same
one is rectum derived.
(The
only way I can get around using the word arse.)
In Matthews gospel Judgement Day there is no Judgement for being Gay
and loving another human of the same sex.
So BE PROUD celebrate PRIDE with PRIDE
__________________
Pauls pharisaical writings
Comments
Post a Comment